0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
0.28%
Revenue growth below 50% of 0335.HK's 175.11%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
-0.76%
Cost reduction while 0335.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
8.80%
Gross profit growth below 50% of 0335.HK's 175.11%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
8.50%
Margin change of 8.50% while 0335.HK shows flat margins. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality advantage.
-35.78%
R&D reduction while 0335.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-60.83%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-8.39%
Marketing expense reduction while 0335.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.58%
Operating expenses growth while 0335.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-0.36%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.52%
D&A growth above 1.5x 0335.HK's 14.28%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
65.59%
EBITDA growth while 0335.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
65.13%
EBITDA margin growth while 0335.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
85.33%
Operating income growth while 0335.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
84.82%
Operating margin growth while 0335.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-230.78%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
59.91%
Pre-tax income growth while 0335.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
59.47%
Pre-tax margin growth while 0335.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
124.26%
Tax expense growth while 0335.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
87.44%
Net income growth while 0335.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
86.92%
Net margin growth while 0335.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
62.43%
EPS growth while 0335.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
62.43%
Diluted EPS growth while 0335.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
15.43%
Share count reduction below 50% of 0335.HK's 0.01%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
15.37%
Diluted share change of 15.37% while 0335.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.