PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.69%
Revenue growth below 50% of 0376.HK's 110.73%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
6.89%
Cost growth of 6.89% while 0376.HK maintains flat costs. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency gap.
27.08%
Positive growth while 0376.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
16.92%
Margin expansion while 0376.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while 0376.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
30.89%
G&A change of 30.89% while 0376.HK maintains overhead. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate efficiency.
43.85%
Marketing expense change of 43.85% while 0376.HK maintains spending. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate effectiveness.
-151.50%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
34.20%
Operating expenses growth while 0376.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
8.85%
Total costs growth less than half of 0376.HK's 380.60%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
20.78%
Interest expense growth while 0376.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
28.59%
D&A growth less than half of 0376.HK's 78.63%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-10.76%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-17.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.39%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-32.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
61.54%
Other expenses growth 1.25-1.5x 0376.HK's 48.03%. Martin Whitman would scrutinize cost items.
-14.43%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-21.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
43.35%
Tax expense growth while 0376.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
3008.70%
Net income growth while 0376.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2760.26%
Net margin growth while 0376.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2827.27%
EPS growth while 0376.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2827.27%
Diluted EPS growth while 0376.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
3.02%
Share count reduction exceeding 1.5x 0376.HK's 221.02%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.
3.02%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x 0376.HK's 221.02%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.