0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-14.52%
Revenue decline while 0425.HK shows 22.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-15.51%
Cost reduction while 0425.HK shows 23.77% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-5.64%
Gross profit decline while 0425.HK shows 21.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
10.39%
Margin expansion while 0425.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-71.23%
R&D reduction while 0425.HK shows 22.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-1.86%
G&A reduction while 0425.HK shows 33.65% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
7.26%
Marketing expense growth less than half of 0425.HK's 41.90%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency advantage is sustainable.
-35.18%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
5.05%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 0425.HK's 76.17%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-13.83%
Total costs reduction while 0425.HK shows 30.11% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-8.91%
Interest expense reduction while 0425.HK shows 3.23% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
10.39%
D&A growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 5.83%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-19.84%
EBITDA decline while 0425.HK shows 10.62% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-6.22%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-40.57%
Operating income decline while 0425.HK shows 11.64% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-30.48%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
74.86%
Other expenses growth while 0425.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-61.35%
Pre-tax income decline while 0425.HK shows 0.33% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-54.78%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-72.37%
Tax expense reduction while 0425.HK shows 21.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-82.23%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-79.21%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-80.89%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-82.21%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-7.43%
Share count reduction while 0425.HK shows 1.22% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x 0425.HK's 1.34%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.