0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-26.84%
Revenue decline while 0425.HK shows 2.92% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-26.16%
Cost reduction while 0425.HK shows 2.74% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-32.02%
Gross profit decline while 0425.HK shows 3.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-7.08%
Margin decline while 0425.HK shows 0.42% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-29.26%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
-25.37%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-40.65%
Marketing expense reduction while 0425.HK shows 22.94% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.02%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-26.69%
Total costs reduction while 0425.HK shows 1.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.64%
D&A growth less than half of 0425.HK's 7.39%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-7.20%
EBITDA decline while 0425.HK shows 12.69% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
26.86%
EBITDA margin growth exceeding 1.5x 0425.HK's 9.50%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
-46.07%
Operating income decline while 0425.HK shows 16.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.28%
Operating margin decline while 0425.HK shows 12.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.47%
Both companies reducing other expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-64.86%
Pre-tax income decline while 0425.HK shows 1.07% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.97%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-80.57%
Tax expense reduction while 0425.HK shows 1.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-92.78%
Net income decline while 0425.HK shows 5.14% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-90.13%
Net margin decline while 0425.HK shows 2.17% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-92.42%
EPS decline while 0425.HK shows 5.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-92.54%
Diluted EPS decline while 0425.HK shows 5.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.68%
Share count reduction while 0425.HK shows 0.04% change. Joel Greenblatt would examine strategy.
0.00%
Diluted share reduction exceeding 1.5x 0425.HK's 0.00%. David Dodd would verify capital allocation.