PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
8.69%
Revenue growth below 50% of 0819.HK's 81.81%. Michael Burry would check for competitive disadvantage risks.
6.89%
Cost growth less than half of 0819.HK's 105.64%. David Dodd would verify if cost advantage is structural.
27.08%
Gross profit growth 1.25-1.5x 0819.HK's 21.08%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine sustainability.
16.92%
Margin expansion while 0819.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-100.00%
R&D reduction while 0819.HK shows 48.28% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
30.89%
G&A growth 50-75% of 0819.HK's 52.80%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine operational efficiency.
43.85%
Marketing expense growth while 0819.HK reduces spending. John Neff would investigate strategic advantage.
-151.50%
Other expenses reduction while 0819.HK shows 129.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency.
34.20%
Similar operating expenses growth to 0819.HK's 37.38%. Walter Schloss would investigate norms.
8.85%
Total costs growth less than half of 0819.HK's 96.24%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
20.78%
Interest expense growth less than half of 0819.HK's 55.28%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
28.59%
D&A growth less than half of 0819.HK's 62.93%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-10.76%
EBITDA decline while 0819.HK shows 17.95% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-17.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-26.39%
Operating income decline while 0819.HK shows 13.99% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-32.28%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
61.54%
Other expenses growth while 0819.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-14.43%
Pre-tax income decline while 0819.HK shows 9.98% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-21.27%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
43.35%
Tax expense growth while 0819.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
3008.70%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x 0819.HK's 15.16%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2760.26%
Net margin growth while 0819.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
2827.27%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x 0819.HK's 10.34%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
2827.27%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x 0819.HK's 14.29%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
3.02%
Share count reduction below 50% of 0819.HK's 2.03%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
3.02%
Diluted share reduction below 50% of 0819.HK's 0.68%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.