0.70 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
15.11M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-30.24%
Both companies show declining revenue. Martin Whitman would check for industry-wide issues.
-30.71%
Cost reduction while 0819.HK shows 0.26% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-24.76%
Both companies show declining gross profit. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
7.86%
Margin expansion while 0819.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-67.10%
Both companies reducing R&D. Martin Whitman would check industry innovation trends.
2.97%
G&A growth while 0819.HK reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-49.94%
Both companies reducing marketing spend. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.59%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-30.02%
Both companies reducing total costs. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-74.57%
Both companies reducing D&A. Martin Whitman would check industry patterns.
-60.33%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-43.13%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
46.87%
Operating income growth while 0819.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
110.53%
Operating margin growth while 0819.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-131.07%
Other expenses reduction while 0819.HK shows 47.82% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-82.89%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-75.47%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-92.37%
Both companies reducing tax expense. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-112.51%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-117.93%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-112.61%
Both companies show declining EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-114.85%
Both companies show declining diluted EPS. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-1.05%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
-14.84%
Both companies reducing diluted shares. Martin Whitman would check patterns.