0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
39.05%
Similar revenue growth to 3606.HK's 40.44%. Walter Schloss would investigate if similar growth reflects similar quality.
42.23%
Cost growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 23.56%. Michael Burry would check for structural cost disadvantages.
12.90%
Gross profit growth below 50% of 3606.HK's 73.33%. Michael Burry would check for structural issues.
-18.80%
Margin decline while 3606.HK shows 23.42% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.30%
G&A reduction while 3606.HK shows 27.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine efficiency advantage.
36.94%
Marketing expense growth 1.1-1.25x 3606.HK's 33.06%. Bill Ackman would demand evidence of superior returns.
0.35%
Other expenses growth less than half of 3606.HK's 311.19%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
9.59%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 3606.HK's 30.03%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
39.56%
Total costs growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 24.85%. Michael Burry would check for inefficiency.
9.32%
Interest expense growth while 3606.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.31%
D&A growth less than half of 3606.HK's 345.87%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-66.73%
EBITDA decline while 3606.HK shows 19.18% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-76.08%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-81.41%
Operating income decline while 3606.HK shows 17.75% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-86.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
156.55%
Other expenses growth less than half of 3606.HK's 329.49%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
-15.21%
Pre-tax income decline while 3606.HK shows 29.63% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-39.02%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
11.52%
Tax expense growth less than half of 3606.HK's 113.60%. David Dodd would verify if advantage is sustainable.
251.72%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x 3606.HK's 13.85%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
209.11%
Net margin growth while 3606.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
251.20%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x 3606.HK's 13.80%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
251.20%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x 3606.HK's 13.80%. David Dodd would verify competitive advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.