PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.40%
Revenue decline while 3606.HK shows 8.79% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-0.46%
Cost reduction while 3606.HK shows 10.01% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-10.04%
Gross profit decline while 3606.HK shows 6.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-8.76%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.99%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-15.29%
Marketing expense reduction while 3606.HK shows 2.59% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
22.94%
Other expenses growth while 3606.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-5.08%
Operating expenses reduction while 3606.HK shows 5.73% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-0.81%
Total costs reduction while 3606.HK shows 9.12% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
16.34%
Interest expense growth 50-75% of 3606.HK's 23.36%. Bruce Berkowitz would examine efficiency.
18.68%
D&A growth less than half of 3606.HK's 151.44%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-44.43%
EBITDA decline while 3606.HK shows 14.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-43.64%
EBITDA margin decline while 3606.HK shows 5.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-49.68%
Operating income decline while 3606.HK shows 4.05% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-48.96%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
91.98%
Other expenses growth while 3606.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-29.34%
Both companies show declining income. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-28.34%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-42.91%
Tax expense reduction while 3606.HK shows 3.50% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
600.81%
Net income growth while 3606.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
607.91%
Net margin growth while 3606.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
542.31%
EPS change of 542.31% while 3606.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
542.31%
Diluted EPS change of 542.31% while 3606.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would examine quality.
12.62%
Share count increase while 3606.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.
12.62%
Diluted share change of 12.62% while 3606.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.