0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
13.79M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-12.49%
Revenue decline while 3606.HK shows 12.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-13.30%
Cost reduction while 3606.HK shows 12.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-5.93%
Gross profit decline while 3606.HK shows 12.34% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
7.50%
Margin expansion while 3606.HK shows decline. John Neff would investigate competitive advantages.
-10.61%
R&D reduction while 3606.HK shows 0.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
7.55%
G&A growth while 3606.HK reduces overhead. John Neff would investigate operational differences.
-10.14%
Marketing expense reduction while 3606.HK shows 3.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.59%
Operating expenses growth less than half of 3606.HK's 12.63%. David Dodd would verify sustainability.
-12.02%
Total costs reduction while 3606.HK shows 12.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.44%
D&A growth less than half of 3606.HK's 130.83%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-22.01%
EBITDA decline while 3606.HK shows 16.00% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-10.88%
EBITDA margin decline while 3606.HK shows 3.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.09%
Operating income decline while 3606.HK shows 9.57% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-29.25%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-151.01%
Other expenses reduction while 3606.HK shows 52.43% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-37.54%
Pre-tax income decline while 3606.HK shows 10.29% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-28.63%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
16.77%
Tax expense growth while 3606.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-46.61%
Net income decline while 3606.HK shows 21.71% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-38.98%
Net margin decline while 3606.HK shows 8.32% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.14%
EPS decline while 3606.HK shows 22.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-58.14%
Diluted EPS decline while 3606.HK shows 22.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
27.41%
Share count reduction below 50% of 3606.HK's 0.00%. Michael Burry would check for concerns.
27.49%
Diluted share change of 27.49% while 3606.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.