0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-25.95%
Revenue decline while 3606.HK shows 2.30% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-23.46%
Cost reduction while 3606.HK shows 2.25% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-48.58%
Gross profit decline while 3606.HK shows 2.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-30.56%
Margin decline while 3606.HK shows 0.07% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
15.24%
R&D growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 0.18%. Michael Burry would check for spending discipline.
-15.41%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-52.43%
Marketing expense reduction while 3606.HK shows 8.53% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.54%
Operating expenses reduction while 3606.HK shows 0.68% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-23.33%
Total costs reduction while 3606.HK shows 1.85% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.39%
D&A growth above 1.5x 3606.HK's 0.21%. Michael Burry would check for excessive investment.
-68.82%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-57.89%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
-122.15%
Operating income decline while 3606.HK shows 2.67% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-129.92%
Operating margin decline while 3606.HK shows 0.36% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
22.99%
Other expenses growth while 3606.HK reduces costs. John Neff would investigate differences.
-115.23%
Pre-tax income decline while 3606.HK shows 0.52% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-120.56%
Both companies show margin pressure. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
478.53%
Tax expense growth while 3606.HK reduces burden. John Neff would investigate differences.
-112.71%
Net income decline while 3606.HK shows 6.87% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-117.17%
Net margin decline while 3606.HK shows 4.47% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-111.92%
EPS decline while 3606.HK shows 5.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-111.92%
Diluted EPS decline while 3606.HK shows 5.88% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
5.84%
Share count change of 5.84% while 3606.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.
5.85%
Diluted share change of 5.85% while 3606.HK is stable. Bruce Berkowitz would verify approach.