0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-26.84%
Revenue decline while 3606.HK shows 7.56% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position erosion.
-26.16%
Cost reduction while 3606.HK shows 6.02% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive advantage.
-32.02%
Gross profit decline while 3606.HK shows 10.22% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-7.08%
Margin decline while 3606.HK shows 2.47% expansion. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive position.
-29.26%
R&D reduction while 3606.HK shows 8.60% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
-25.37%
Both companies reducing G&A. Martin Whitman would check industry cost trends.
-40.65%
Marketing expense reduction while 3606.HK shows 2.66% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine competitive risk.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.02%
Both companies reducing operating expenses. Martin Whitman would check industry trends.
-26.69%
Total costs reduction while 3606.HK shows 4.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.64%
D&A growth less than half of 3606.HK's 3.85%. David Dodd would verify if efficiency is sustainable.
-7.20%
Both companies show EBITDA decline. Martin Whitman would check industry conditions.
26.86%
EBITDA margin growth while 3606.HK declines. John Neff would investigate advantages.
-46.07%
Operating income decline while 3606.HK shows 42.38% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-26.28%
Operating margin decline while 3606.HK shows 32.37% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-100.47%
Other expenses reduction while 3606.HK shows 121.06% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-64.86%
Pre-tax income decline while 3606.HK shows 43.44% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-51.97%
Pre-tax margin decline while 3606.HK shows 33.35% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-80.57%
Tax expense reduction while 3606.HK shows 3.58% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine advantage.
-92.78%
Net income decline while 3606.HK shows 52.09% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-90.13%
Net margin decline while 3606.HK shows 41.40% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-92.42%
EPS decline while 3606.HK shows 52.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-92.54%
Diluted EPS decline while 3606.HK shows 52.83% growth. Joel Greenblatt would examine position.
-0.68%
Both companies reducing share counts. Martin Whitman would check patterns.
0.00%
Diluted share increase while 3606.HK reduces shares. John Neff would investigate differences.