0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
17.22M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-57.73%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.60%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-57.73%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.26%
G&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
-100.00%
Marketing expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
-3040.55%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-479.05%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.08%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
39.70%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.35%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-31.22%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-7.79%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-757.81%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.11%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-1929.14%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-513.63%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-1351.54%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
79.89%
Other expenses change of 79.89% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-175.77%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-552.34%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
803.09%
Tax expense change of 803.09% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
-238.98%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.12%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-701.86%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-239.53%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-239.53%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.