0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
50.07%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.45%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.89%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.24%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-40.62%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.64%
G&A change of 14.64% versus flat Consumer Cyclical overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-54.49%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.79%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
52.93%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.83%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-1.09%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-89.85%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-360.55%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-273.61%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-1059.06%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-739.06%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
1.09%
Other expenses change of 1.09% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-32.20%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
11.91%
Margin change of 11.91% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
1077.51%
Tax expense change of 1077.51% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
-36.72%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
8.90%
Margin change of 8.90% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-34.78%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-34.78%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.