0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
17.22M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
30.01%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.55%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
116.82%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.15%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
-29.38%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.89%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-45.68%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.80%
G&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
100.00%
Marketing expense change of 100.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
100.00%
Other expenses change of 100.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
-203.48%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.36%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-128.45%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.29%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-49.08%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
4667.92%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.37%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
1413.43%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.40%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
1110.27%
Margin change of 1110.27% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
1247.29%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.95%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
982.48%
Margin change of 982.48% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-110.44%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
352.33%
Income change of 352.33% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
294.09%
Margin change of 294.09% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-94.38%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
342.74%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.26%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
286.71%
Margin change of 286.71% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
175.79%
EPS change of 175.79% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
175.79%
Diluted EPS change of 175.79% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
85.89%
Share count change of 85.89% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
85.89%
Diluted share change of 85.89% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.