0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
17045.22%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.61%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
22864.51%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.19%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
4822.56%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.01%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
-71.29%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1255.04%
G&A change of 1255.04% versus flat Consumer Cyclical overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
1240.97%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.20%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
44268.92%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.35%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-100.00%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
672.34%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.41%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
350.13%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.72%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
101.46%
Margin change of 101.46% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
323.00%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.15%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
-97.53%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-100.00%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
339.03%
Income change of 339.03% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-97.44%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
118541.36%
Tax expense change of 118541.36% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
237.25%
Income change of 237.25% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-98.03%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
913.95%
EPS change of 913.95% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
913.95%
Diluted EPS change of 913.95% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
18.11%
Share count change of 18.11% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
18.11%
Diluted share change of 18.11% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.