PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.680.04 (-5.56%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
17.22M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-1.40%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.89%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-0.46%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.81%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-10.04%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.59%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-8.76%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.99%
G&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
-15.29%
Marketing expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
22.94%
Other expenses change of 22.94% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
-5.08%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.91%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-0.81%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 4.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
16.34%
Interest expense change of 16.34% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify control.
18.68%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.06%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
-44.43%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.75%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-43.64%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-49.68%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.87%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-48.96%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
91.98%
Other expenses change of 91.98% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-29.34%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 4.02%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-28.34%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-42.91%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
600.81%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 4.60%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
607.91%
Margin change of 607.91% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
542.31%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.63%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
542.31%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.96%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
12.62%
Share count change of 12.62% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
12.62%
Diluted share change of 12.62% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.