0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
7.83%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.24%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
8.41%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.88%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
2.90%
Gross profit growth near Consumer Cyclical median of 3.22%. Charlie Munger would verify if industry economics are attractive.
-4.57%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.32%
G&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
-3.50%
Marketing expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
50.00%
Other expenses change of 50.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
-2.36%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.99%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
7.44%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.91%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-50.00%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-4.94%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.48%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
15.44%
EBITDA change of 15.44% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
7.06%
Margin change of 7.06% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
35.35%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.51%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
25.52%
Margin change of 25.52% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
0.06%
Other expenses change of 0.06% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
44.25%
Pre-tax income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.28%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
33.77%
Margin change of 33.77% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
56.70%
Tax expense change of 56.70% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
-19.07%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.22%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-24.95%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-9.25%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-5.78%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-10.94%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-14.43%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.