PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-14.52%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.72%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-15.51%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.79%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-5.64%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.52%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
10.39%
Margin change of 10.39% versus flat Consumer Cyclical margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-71.23%
R&D reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
-1.86%
G&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
7.26%
Marketing expense change of 7.26% versus flat Consumer Cyclical spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-35.18%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
5.05%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.96%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-13.83%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.54%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-8.91%
Interest expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
10.39%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.89%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
-19.84%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-6.22%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-40.57%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-30.48%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
74.86%
Other expenses growth while Consumer Cyclical reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
-61.35%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-54.78%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-72.37%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-82.23%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-79.21%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-80.89%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-82.21%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-7.43%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
0.01%
Diluted share change of 0.01% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.