0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-12.49%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.43%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-13.30%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.23%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-5.93%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
7.50%
Margin change of 7.50% versus flat Consumer Cyclical margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-10.61%
R&D reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
7.55%
G&A change of 7.55% versus flat Consumer Cyclical overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
-10.14%
Marketing expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.59%
Operating expenses growth below 50% of Consumer Cyclical median of 1.97%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate efficiency.
-12.02%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.02%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.44%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.25%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
-22.01%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-10.88%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-38.09%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-29.25%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-151.01%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-37.54%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-28.63%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.81%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
16.77%
Tax expense change of 16.77% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
-46.61%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-38.98%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-58.14%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-58.14%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
27.41%
Share count change of 27.41% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
27.49%
Diluted share change of 27.49% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.