0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
17.22M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
18.56%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.05%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate if growth quality matches quantity.
19.78%
Cost growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.47%. Jim Chanos would check for structural cost disadvantages.
9.40%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.31%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate competitive advantages.
-7.73%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
75.26%
R&D change of 75.26% versus flat Consumer Cyclical spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
8.00%
G&A change of 8.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
2.08%
Marketing expense change of 2.08% versus flat Consumer Cyclical spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.48%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.39%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
18.06%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.75%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.72%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.51%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
7.44%
EBITDA growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.95%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
-9.38%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
21.32%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.30%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
2.33%
Margin change of 2.33% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
635.24%
Other expenses change of 635.24% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
70.12%
Income change of 70.12% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
43.49%
Margin change of 43.49% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
21.34%
Tax expense change of 21.34% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
66.19%
Income change of 66.19% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
40.17%
Margin change of 40.17% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
67.59%
EPS change of 67.59% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
67.59%
Diluted EPS change of 67.59% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-0.74%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-0.67%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.