PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-13.14%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.29%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-13.06%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.42%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-13.81%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-0.77%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-18.82%
R&D reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
0.82%
G&A change of 0.82% versus flat Consumer Cyclical overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
-45.39%
Marketing expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.54%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.62%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-14.34%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.31%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.00%
D&A change of 12.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
2.51%
EBITDA change of 2.51% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
18.01%
Margin change of 18.01% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
0.61%
Income change of 0.61% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
15.82%
Margin change of 15.82% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
1381.20%
Other expenses change of 1381.20% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
25.70%
Income change of 25.70% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
44.71%
Margin change of 44.71% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
121.85%
Tax expense change of 121.85% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
27.53%
Income change of 27.53% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
46.82%
Margin change of 46.82% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-44.39%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
3.34%
Diluted EPS change of 3.34% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
129.62%
Share count change of 129.62% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
23.43%
Diluted share change of 23.43% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.