PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.70 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
15.11M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-15.81%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.36%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-15.27%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.52%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-20.70%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.06%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-5.81%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-34.95%
R&D reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
3.40%
G&A change of 3.40% versus flat Consumer Cyclical overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
18.10%
Marketing expense change of 18.10% versus flat Consumer Cyclical spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.13%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.67%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
-13.90%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.54%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.47%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.37%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
-76.04%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-71.54%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-93.78%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-92.61%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
8.24%
Other expenses change of 8.24% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-74.89%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-70.18%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-75.17%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-52.25%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-43.28%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-41.23%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-51.99%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-18.65%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-0.28%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.