PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.70 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
15.11M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
39.61%
Growth of 39.61% versus flat Consumer Cyclical revenue. Walter Schloss would verify growth quality.
41.84%
Cost growth of 41.84% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify cost control.
17.91%
Growth of 17.91% versus flat Consumer Cyclical gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-15.54%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
97.36%
R&D change of 97.36% versus flat Consumer Cyclical spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-5.77%
G&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
13.50%
Marketing expense change of 13.50% versus flat Consumer Cyclical spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.95%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.24%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
40.20%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.10%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
237.32%
D&A change of 237.32% versus flat Consumer Cyclical D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
201.01%
EBITDA change of 201.01% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
115.62%
EBITDA margin growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
66.33%
Income change of 66.33% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
19.14%
Margin change of 19.14% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
13.36%
Other expenses change of 13.36% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
24.05%
Income change of 24.05% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-11.14%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.57%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-25.17%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-47.50%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-62.40%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-11.19%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-47.67%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-40.81%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.