PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-30.24%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.81%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-30.71%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.27%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-24.76%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.34%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
7.86%
Margin change of 7.86% versus flat Consumer Cyclical margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-67.10%
R&D reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
2.97%
G&A change of 2.97% versus flat Consumer Cyclical overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
-49.94%
Marketing expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.59%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-30.02%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.93%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-74.57%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.61%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-60.33%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.83%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-43.13%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.30%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
46.87%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.31%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate advantages.
110.53%
Margin change of 110.53% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-131.07%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-82.89%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-75.47%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-92.37%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-112.51%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-117.93%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-112.61%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-114.85%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-1.05%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
-14.84%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.