PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
31.66%
Growth of 31.66% versus flat Consumer Cyclical revenue. Walter Schloss would verify growth quality.
32.33%
Cost growth of 32.33% versus flat Consumer Cyclical costs. Walter Schloss would verify cost control.
24.43%
Growth of 24.43% versus flat Consumer Cyclical gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-5.49%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.05%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
435.21%
R&D change of 435.21% versus flat Consumer Cyclical spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-6.77%
G&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
83.82%
Marketing expense change of 83.82% versus flat Consumer Cyclical spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
65.15%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.86%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
34.86%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.08%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.62%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.53%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
-94.56%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -2.05%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-95.87%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -2.54%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-226.33%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -3.84%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-195.95%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -2.84%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-954.72%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is -3.39%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-1790.26%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -9.77%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-1383.83%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -7.05%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
1309.78%
Tax expense change of 1309.78% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
-3875.78%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -11.03%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-2919.79%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -5.77%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-3833.33%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -9.84%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-3833.33%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -9.88%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
1.06%
Share count change of 1.06% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.