0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
17.22M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-25.95%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.84%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-23.46%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.57%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-48.58%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.61%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-30.56%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
15.24%
R&D change of 15.24% versus flat Consumer Cyclical spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-15.41%
G&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
-52.43%
Marketing expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.54%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.76%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-23.33%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.77%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.39%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.26%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
-68.82%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-57.89%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-122.15%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-129.92%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
22.99%
Other expenses change of 22.99% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
-115.23%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-120.56%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
478.53%
Tax expense change of 478.53% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
-112.71%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-117.17%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-111.92%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-111.92%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
5.84%
Share count change of 5.84% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
5.85%
Diluted share change of 5.85% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.