PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.680.04 (-5.56%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
17.22M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
1.16%
Revenue growth below 50% of Consumer Cyclical median of 3.58%. Jim Chanos would check for market share loss risks.
-0.24%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 5.18%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
20.10%
Growth of 20.10% versus flat Consumer Cyclical gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
18.72%
Margin change of 18.72% versus flat Consumer Cyclical margins. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
146.15%
R&D change of 146.15% versus flat Consumer Cyclical spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-35.77%
G&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
78.41%
Marketing expense change of 78.41% versus flat Consumer Cyclical spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.46%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 5.65%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
0.92%
Total costs growth below 50% of Consumer Cyclical median of 6.29%. Joel Greenblatt would investigate efficiency.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.39%
D&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.85%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency.
-12.96%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-13.96%
EBITDA margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is -2.79%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
8.18%
Income change of 8.18% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
9.24%
Operating margin growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
202.61%
Other expenses change of 202.61% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify control.
89.46%
Pre-tax income growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
89.58%
Margin change of 89.58% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
1.46%
Tax expense change of 1.46% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify strategy.
85.09%
Income change of 85.09% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
85.26%
Margin change of 85.26% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
84.38%
EPS change of 84.38% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
85.94%
Diluted EPS change of 85.94% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-6.85%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
1.22%
Diluted share change of 1.22% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.