0.70 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
15.11M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
5.99%
Growth of 5.99% versus flat Consumer Cyclical revenue. Walter Schloss would verify growth quality.
1.90%
Cost growth 1.25-1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.35%. Guy Spier would scrutinize cost control weaknesses.
52.56%
Growth of 52.56% versus flat Consumer Cyclical gross profit. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
43.94%
Margin expansion while Consumer Cyclical median declines. Peter Lynch would examine competitive advantages.
47.15%
R&D change of 47.15% versus flat Consumer Cyclical spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
33.34%
G&A change of 33.34% versus flat Consumer Cyclical overhead. Walter Schloss would verify efficiency.
74.58%
Marketing expense change of 74.58% versus flat Consumer Cyclical spending. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
54.22%
Operating expenses growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.67%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
5.83%
Total costs growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.49%. Jim Chanos would check for waste.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.17%
D&A growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.03%. Jim Chanos would check for overinvestment.
13.70%
EBITDA growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
7.27%
EBITDA margin growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
90.29%
Operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
79.53%
Operating margin growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
368.25%
Other expenses growth while Consumer Cyclical reduces costs. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
364.71%
Pre-tax income growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
338.44%
Pre-tax margin growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
349.42%
Tax expense growth while Consumer Cyclical reduces burden. Peter Lynch would examine differences.
1343.52%
Net income growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
1261.93%
Net margin growth while Consumer Cyclical declines. Peter Lynch would examine advantages.
1220.00%
EPS change of 1220.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
1240.00%
Diluted EPS change of 1240.00% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
0.83%
Share count change of 0.83% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.
-0.00%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.