PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Helps investors judge whether earnings growth is driven by sustainable operations or temporary factors. Consistent, organic income expansion can justify a higher intrinsic value for patient, long-term investors.
-26.84%
Revenue decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.87%. Seth Klarman would investigate if market share loss is temporary.
-26.16%
Cost reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.48%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive advantage potential.
-32.02%
Gross profit decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.18%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-7.08%
Margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive position.
-29.26%
R&D reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
-25.37%
G&A reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate efficiency gains.
-40.65%
Marketing expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate competitive implications.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-31.02%
Operating expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-26.69%
Total costs reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.90%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.64%
D&A change of 1.64% versus flat Consumer Cyclical D&A. Walter Schloss would verify adequacy.
-7.20%
EBITDA decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
26.86%
Margin change of 26.86% versus flat Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify quality.
-46.07%
Operating income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.30%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-26.28%
Operating margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-100.47%
Other expenses reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-64.86%
Pre-tax income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-51.97%
Pre-tax margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-80.57%
Tax expense reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate advantages.
-92.78%
Net income decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-90.13%
Net margin decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-92.42%
EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-92.54%
Diluted EPS decline while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate causes.
-0.68%
Share count reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate strategy.
0.00%
Diluted share change of 0.00% versus stable Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss would verify approach.