40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.68M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
1.72
1.5–2 – Reasonable coverage. Seth Klarman would verify if cyclical factors might push it below comfort levels.
1.56
1.5–2.0 – Good coverage. Seth Klarman might check if seasonal factors affect the ratio significantly.
0.18
Below 0.4 – Weak immediate liquidity. Howard Marks would worry about meeting obligations if markets tighten.
8.60
5–10 – Solid coverage. Seth Klarman might verify if the ratio is consistent or if one-off gains boost EBIT.
7.32
Above 3.0 – Excellent short-term coverage. Warren Buffett would verify if the firm can redirect excess cash flow elsewhere.