40.40 - 41.05
29.80 - 47.18
2.12M / 3.66M (Avg.)
18.02 | 2.27
Highlights the firm's ability to meet near-term obligations and cover interest expenses. For conservative value investors, strong liquidity and coverage metrics are critical to avoid distress or forced dilution.
1.81
1.5–2 – Reasonable coverage. Seth Klarman would verify if cyclical factors might push it below comfort levels.
1.81
1.5–2.0 – Good coverage. Seth Klarman might check if seasonal factors affect the ratio significantly.
0.78
0.7–1.0 – Decent. Peter Lynch might see partial reliance on future cash inflows to fully cover obligations.
15.73
Interest coverage above 15 – Exceptional. Warren Buffett would see little near-term default risk unless earnings collapse.
-3.86
Negative short-term coverage ratio usually means negative OCF or an outsized near-term debt – a major Graham red flag.