95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
8.84%
Cash & equivalents growing 8.84% while AEM's declined -72.28%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.84%
Below half of AEM's -72.28%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-28.03%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
3.80%
Inventory growth below half of AEM's -4.42%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-1.50%
Other current assets growth < half of AEM's 3.57%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-3.82%
Below half of AEM's -47.97%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-1.49%
Below half AEM's 2.52%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.49%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.49%
Less than half of AEM's 100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.49%
Less than half of AEM's -24.98%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-1.49%
Below half of AEM's 0.64%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.62%
Below half of AEM's -11.33%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-30.03%
Above 1.5x AEM's -9.92%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.51%
Less than half of AEM's 49.09%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-28.40%
Less than half of AEM's 4.70%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.03%
1.25-1.5x AEM's -21.29%. Martin Whitman is wary of heavier future burdens.
30.03%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-28.40%
1.25-1.5x AEM's -19.71%. Martin Whitman is wary of bigger liability expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.80%
Below half AEM's -17.56%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.62%
Below half AEM's -1.66%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
-2.62%
Below half AEM's -11.33%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.84%
Less than half of AEM's 9.84%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.