95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-3.85%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-3.85% vs AEM's -7.65%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.85%
Cash + STI yoy 0.5-0.75x AEM's -7.65%. Martin Whitman would worry about lagging short-term reserves. Confirm debt coverage.
7.50%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
7.03%
Similar inventory growth to AEM's 7.75%. Walter Schloss notes comparable inventory strategies or sector norms.
100.00%
Other current assets growth < half of AEM's -14.83%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
4.17%
Below half of AEM's -8.10%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-2.58%
Below half AEM's 2.33%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.35%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
5.35%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.21%
Less than half of AEM's 12.43%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
2.91%
1.25-1.5x AEM's 2.41%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions surpass competitor's pace but remain justified.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.74%
Below half of AEM's -1.24%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
6.85%
Less than half of AEM's -4.39%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.85%
Less than half of AEM's -26.29%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.85%
Less than half of AEM's -0.12%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
-6.85%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
6.85%
Less than half of AEM's -2.94%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.48%
≥ 1.5x AEM's -3.18%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
-5.35%
Less than half of AEM's 61.87%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.49%
Below half AEM's -0.41%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
3.74%
Below half AEM's -1.24%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.85%
Less than half of AEM's 127.35%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.