95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
38.58%
Cash & equivalents growing 38.58% while AEM's declined -9.85%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
38.58%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x AEM's 4.77%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-44.91%
Similar receivables growth to AEM's -42.30%. Walter Schloss would see comparable credit policies, investigating any subtle differences in sales.
-100.00%
Inventory growth below half of AEM's 2.33%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-18.39%
Above 1.5x AEM's -10.02%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
33.26%
Below half of AEM's -2.93%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.29%
Similar yoy growth to AEM's -1.30%. Walter Schloss sees parallel approach in non-core expansions.
-1.29%
Below half of AEM's 2.36%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.18%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 0.81%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-9.56%
Less than half of AEM's -24.87%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-16.52%
Similar yoy to AEM's -18.12%. Walter Schloss sees parallel short-term liability strategies.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.56%
Above 1.5x AEM's -0.97%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
9.56%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-16.52%
Above 1.5x AEM's -3.04%. Michael Burry sees a potential leverage warning sign.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
103.03%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 7.88%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
0.06%
Less than half of AEM's -1.91%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
100.00%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
4.27%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 2.78%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
4.18%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 0.81%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-38.58%
Less than half of AEM's 22.34%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.