95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-20.05%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-20.05% vs AEM's -24.96%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.05%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x AEM's -0.11%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-16.63%
Receivables growth above 1.5x AEM's -0.58%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
12.68%
Other current assets growth < half of AEM's 30.82%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-19.93%
Below half of AEM's 8.13%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.18%
Above 1.5x AEM's 5.60%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
10.18%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 2.54%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.08%
Similar yoy to AEM's 4.12%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions. Evaluate the quality of these assets.
-34.97%
Less than half of AEM's 26.09%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.30%
Less than half of AEM's 16.19%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.97%
Less than half of AEM's 5.40%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
34.97%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-27.30%
Less than half of AEM's 6.50%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.15%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 1.38%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
-0.46%
Less than half of AEM's 30.49%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.19%
1.25-1.5x AEM's 2.98%. Bruce Berkowitz notes an above-average equity expansion.
4.08%
Similar yoy to AEM's 4.12%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in total capital.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.05%
Less than half of AEM's 41.99%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.