95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-3.16%
Cash & equivalents declining -3.16% while AEM's grows 13.20%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.16%
Below half of AEM's 7.92%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-22.74%
Receivables growth less than half of AEM's -100.00%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-100.00%
Inventory growth above 1.5x AEM's -5.33%. Michael Burry might suspect a looming inventory glut. Check free cash flow impact.
-15.29%
Other current assets growth < half of AEM's 53.64%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-4.14%
Below half of AEM's 13.03%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.78%
Less than half of AEM's -75.57%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
4.78%
1.25-1.5x AEM's 4.23%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if expansions surpass competitor's pace but remain justified.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.88%
0.5-0.75x AEM's 7.66%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
-25.28%
Less than half of AEM's 39.14%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.72%
Less than half of AEM's 62.77%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.65%
Less than half of AEM's 32.98%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
0.65%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.72%
Less than half of AEM's 39.82%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.97%
Below half AEM's 112.04%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
0.29%
Less than half of AEM's -71.69%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.99%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 2.59%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
3.88%
0.5-0.75x AEM's 7.66%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.66%
Less than half of AEM's -13.20%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.