95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-41.37%
Cash & equivalents declining -41.37% while AEM's grows 15.84%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-41.37%
Below half of AEM's 15.84%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
59.37%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-100.00%
Inventory growth below half of AEM's 38.15%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
27.74%
Other current assets growth < half of AEM's -6.44%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-39.94%
Below half of AEM's 10.90%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.90%
Above 1.5x AEM's 5.19%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
12.03%
Below half of AEM's 86.64%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.81%
Below half of AEM's 57.04%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
65.01%
50-75% of AEM's 102.17%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the company is paying suppliers faster or not stretching terms as competitor does.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.98%
Higher Tax Payables Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.98%
Less than half of AEM's -1.67%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
35.86%
50-75% of AEM's 67.21%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the firm keeps current liabilities growth relatively low.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.98%
Less than half of AEM's 174.14%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.98%
Less than half of AEM's 152.82%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
45.25%
Less than half of AEM's 134.29%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
16.11%
Below half AEM's 161.23%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
29.67%
50-75% of AEM's 43.22%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower AOCI expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.66%
Below half AEM's 41.38%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
6.81%
Below half AEM's 57.04%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
41.37%
Less than half of AEM's -15.84%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.