95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
463.14%
Cash & equivalents growing 463.14% while AEM's declined -40.94%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
463.14%
Below half of AEM's -29.88%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-39.98%
Higher Net Receivables Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.94%
Other current assets growth < half of AEM's -75.25%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
303.03%
Below half of AEM's -24.94%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.15%
Less than half of AEM's -0.81%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
7.15%
0.5-0.75x AEM's 12.50%. Martin Whitman wonders if there's insufficient reinvestment vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.52%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 5.58%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-7.49%
Less than half of AEM's 37.02%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.93%
1.25-1.5x AEM's 32.02%. Martin Whitman is wary of bigger short-term burdens.
29.76%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
29.76%
Above 1.5x AEM's 18.44%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
31.24%
1.25-1.5x AEM's 20.99%. Martin Whitman is wary of bigger liability expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.84%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 5.91%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
-40.43%
Above 1.5x AEM's -9.60%. Michael Burry sees a significant jump in intangible or market-based gains. Scrutinize risk of reversal.
100.00%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.93%
Below half AEM's 0.55%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
9.52%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 5.58%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
27.56%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
20.10%
Less than half of AEM's 70.67%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.