95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-62.40%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-62.40% vs AEM's -24.67%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-62.40%
Cash + STI yoy 1.25-1.5x AEM's -50.67%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if the firm is preparing for expansions or simply hoarding.
-83.67%
Receivables growth above 1.5x AEM's -25.17%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.17%
Other current assets growth < half of AEM's 182.85%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-62.91%
Below half of AEM's 1.52%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.98%
Less than half of AEM's -44.09%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-6.98%
Below half of AEM's 9.24%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.63%
Below half of AEM's 8.23%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-31.58%
Less than half of AEM's 11.37%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-6.06%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both AEM and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-100.00%
Less than half of AEM's 104.57%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-34.01%
Less than half of AEM's 11.60%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-28.93%
Less than half of AEM's 300.00%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.93%
Less than half of AEM's 29.79%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.42%
Less than half of AEM's 26.06%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.26%
Below half AEM's 9.39%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-126.02%
Less than half of AEM's 171.75%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.61%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 1.23%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
-8.63%
Below half AEM's 8.23%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.61%
Less than half of AEM's 300.00%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-24.82%
Less than half of AEM's 353.91%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.