95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
18.72%
Cash & equivalents growing 18.72% while AEM's declined -13.36%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.72%
Below half of AEM's -11.34%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
59.82%
Receivables growth above 1.5x AEM's 19.17%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.42%
Other current assets growth < half of AEM's 183.12%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
18.90%
Below half of AEM's -6.56%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-0.78%
Below half AEM's 0.30%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.62%
Both AEM and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-67.67%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-1.67%
Less than half of AEM's 7.17%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-1.29%
Below half of AEM's 0.43%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.65%
Below half of AEM's -0.71%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-21.21%
Less than half of AEM's 65.90%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Less than half of AEM's 30.43%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
18.98%
Above 1.5x AEM's 3.72%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
-14.26%
1.25-1.5x AEM's -9.79%. Martin Whitman is wary of bigger leverage expansion vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.26%
Above 1.5x AEM's -5.24%. Michael Burry sees a strong spike vs. competitor. Check coverage and debt ratios.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
11.35%
Less than half of AEM's -3.99%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.81%
Below half AEM's 34.45%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-176.79%
1.25-1.5x AEM's -138.97%. Martin Whitman is wary of bigger swings in AOCI.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.10%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 1.53%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
4.65%
Below half AEM's -0.71%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-6.62%
0.5-0.75x AEM's -8.96%. Martin Whitman sees possible missed opportunities vs. competitor.
-9.08%
Similar yoy changes to AEM's -9.64%. Walter Schloss notes parallel total debt strategies.
-21.59%
Above 1.5x AEM's -8.75%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.