95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-8.17%
Cash & equivalents declining -8.17% while AEM's grows 27.43%. Howard Marks would question why our liquidity is shrinking while competitor builds cash.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.17%
Below half of AEM's 26.42%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-3.56%
Receivables growth less than half of AEM's -82.09%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
238799900.00%
Inventory growth below half of AEM's -3.25%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
-97.12%
Other current assets growth < half of AEM's 237.67%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-9.00%
Below half of AEM's 7.23%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-1.07%
Below half AEM's 2.76%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.07%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-3.07%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to AEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-21.45%
Below half of AEM's 33.08%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
462.48%
Less than half of AEM's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
-58.07%
Less than half of AEM's 42.98%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-1.94%
Below half of AEM's 4.10%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.20%
Below half of AEM's 4.49%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-22.30%
Less than half of AEM's -56.59%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.01%
Below half of AEM's 60.97%. Michael Burry suspects a big gap in pre-sales traction.
-8.43%
Less than half of AEM's 167.96%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-14.81%
Less than half of AEM's 5.20%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-60.00%
Less than half of AEM's 0.04%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
61.05%
≥ 1.5x AEM's 0.69%. David Dodd sees stronger long-horizon revenue vs. competitor.
3.88%
Above 1.5x AEM's 0.69%. Michael Burry sees a much bigger deferred tax load building up.
6.83%
Less than half of AEM's 33.50%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
-57.97%
Less than half of AEM's 5.84%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-55.04%
Less than half of AEM's 5.76%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.22%
Less than half of AEM's 0.49%. David Dodd sees fewer share issuances vs. competitor.
7.88%
Below half AEM's 24.60%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-86.67%
Less than half of AEM's 132.97%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.94%
0.75-0.9x AEM's 3.63%. Bill Ackman wonders if competitor is growing equity faster.
-2.20%
Below half AEM's 4.49%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-21.45%
Below half AEM's 31.84%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-59.56%
Less than half of AEM's 0.20%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-97.88%
Above 1.5x AEM's -6.09%. Michael Burry sees a major gap in net debt growth. Check coverage and liquidity.