95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-34.80%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-34.80% vs AEM's -5.23%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.80%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x AEM's -4.88%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-1.94%
Similar receivables growth to AEM's -1.97%. Walter Schloss would see comparable credit policies, investigating any subtle differences in sales.
-43.80%
Inventory growth below half of AEM's 0.57%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
0.67%
Other current assets growth < half of AEM's 15.44%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-34.07%
≥ 1.5x AEM's -0.56%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
5.33%
Below half AEM's -94.38%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
222.70%
50-75% of AEM's 409.63%. Bruce Berkowitz notes moderate intangible additions. Check if growth is organically driven.
222.70%
Less than half of AEM's -9.23%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible expansions vs. competitor. Possibly safer balance sheet.
47.95%
Below half of AEM's 7294.93%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
-59.91%
Less than half of AEM's 295.95%. David Dodd sees fewer tax deferrals or losses, indicating stronger profitability vs. competitor.
193.14%
Less than half of AEM's -9.41%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
6.83%
Below half of AEM's -2.50%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.74%
Below half of AEM's -2.35%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
12.16%
Less than half of AEM's -57.96%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
17.95%
Less than half of AEM's -5.48%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3128.37%
Above 1.5x AEM's 0.40%. Michael Burry sees a much bigger deferred tax load building up.
31.70%
Above 1.5x AEM's 2.01%. Michael Burry suspects a looming risk from large additions to LT liabilities.
55.98%
Less than half of AEM's -0.21%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.12%
Less than half of AEM's -0.84%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-0.43%
Above 1.5x AEM's -0.21%. Michael Burry suspects heavy new equity expansion or dilution.
2.66%
Below half AEM's -37.74%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
138.99%
50-75% of AEM's 192.76%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower AOCI expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.56%
Below half AEM's -3.06%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
1.74%
Below half AEM's -2.35%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
47.95%
Below half AEM's 7054.08%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-0.75%
Less than half of AEM's -5.38%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
35.05%
Less than half of AEM's -5.42%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.