95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-7.34%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-7.34% vs FNV's -85.79%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.34%
Below half of FNV's -85.79%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
147.04%
Receivables growth less than half of FNV's -4.42%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-33.66%
Other current assets growth < half of FNV's 381.13%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-6.47%
Below half of FNV's -74.39%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
5.59%
Below half FNV's 29.98%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.75%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-6.75%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
1.32%
Below half of FNV's 10.72%. Michael Burry sees possible underinvestment in long-term assets. Verify capital constraints.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-74.81%
Above 1.5x FNV's -8.50%. Michael Burry warns of potential hidden liabilities or intangible bloat.
4.73%
Below half of FNV's 26.71%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.14%
0.5-0.75x FNV's 5.52%. Martin Whitman worries about slower asset growth than competitor. Is it strategy or constraint?
2.25%
Less than half of FNV's 9.45%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
106042.45%
Above 1.5x FNV's 66.89%. Michael Burry questions if there's an abrupt jump in tax obligations or poor payment scheduling.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.89%
Higher Other Current Liabilities Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
44.25%
1.1-1.25x FNV's 37.93%. Bill Ackman questions if the firm is taking on more near-term obligations than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.61%
Less than half of FNV's 17.54%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
-35.26%
Similar yoy changes to FNV's -34.10%. Walter Schloss sees parallel expansions in other LT liabilities.
-33.48%
Less than half of FNV's 11.53%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.03%
Less than half of FNV's 15.99%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.16%
1.25-1.5x FNV's 0.12%. Martin Whitman sees potential dilution risk vs. competitor approach.
5.87%
Below half FNV's 28.77%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
15.67%
Less than half of FNV's 90.22%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.48%
0.5-0.75x FNV's 4.92%. Martin Whitman is wary of lagging equity growth vs. competitor.
3.14%
0.5-0.75x FNV's 5.52%. Martin Whitman sees underexpansion or possible missed opportunities.
1.32%
Below half FNV's 10.72%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
1.99%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
7.41%
Less than half of FNV's 85.79%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.