95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-48.38%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-48.38% vs FNV's -54.06%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-48.38%
Cash + STI yoy 1.25-1.5x FNV's -32.46%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if the firm is preparing for expansions or simply hoarding.
284.08%
Receivables growth less than half of FNV's -10.44%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
80.93%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-39.70%
1.25-1.5x FNV's -28.01%. Bruce Berkowitz checks if strong current asset growth is used effectively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-99.85%
Similar yoy growth to FNV's -98.49%. Walter Schloss sees parallel approach in non-core expansions.
5.86%
≥ 1.5x FNV's 2.38%. David Dodd sees significantly higher long-term asset buildup. Confirm synergy with strategy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.32%
Below half of FNV's -4.29%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
47.41%
Higher Accounts Payable Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
6.45%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.12%
Less than half of FNV's -11.64%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
5.86%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
5.86%
Less than half of FNV's 29.08%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.53%
Less than half of FNV's 21.65%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.14%
Below half FNV's 27.25%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
100.00%
Less than half of FNV's -205.20%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.23%
Below half FNV's -5.28%. Michael Burry sees potential underperformance in building shareholder capital.
5.32%
Below half FNV's -4.29%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.91%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
8.09%
Less than half of FNV's 54.06%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.