PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-25.35%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-25.35% vs FNV's -74.07%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-25.35%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x FNV's -5.87%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
-11.21%
Receivables growth less than half of FNV's 26.10%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.97%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-24.93%
≥ 1.5x FNV's -4.50%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
-0.46%
Below half FNV's 6.39%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
48.19%
≥ 1.5x FNV's 22.00%. David Dodd sees an aggressive push into LT investments. Confirm risk management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.80%
Less than half of FNV's 14.07%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
0.75%
Below half of FNV's 7.84%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.72%
Below half of FNV's 4.24%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
213.41%
Higher Accounts Payable Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-83.08%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both FNV and the company show zero Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth.
-100.00%
Less than half of FNV's 42.94%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
-44.56%
Less than half of FNV's 42.94%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
-6.25%
Higher Long-Term Debt Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.68%
Higher Other Non-Current Liabilities Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-0.93%
Less than half of FNV's 13.74%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-21.34%
Less than half of FNV's 16.22%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
-100.00%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
17.34%
Below half FNV's 189.08%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
68.80%
Similar yoy to FNV's 83.24%. Walter Schloss sees parallel comprehensive income changes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.66%
1.25-1.5x FNV's 3.74%. Bruce Berkowitz notes an above-average equity expansion.
-2.72%
Below half FNV's 4.24%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
48.19%
Below half FNV's 232.39%. Michael Burry suspects major underinvestment or forced divestment.
-52.05%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to FNV's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-321.65%
Less than half of FNV's 74.07%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.