95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-3.16%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-3.16% vs FSM's -46.13%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.16%
Below half of FSM's -79.71%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-22.74%
Receivables growth less than half of FSM's -100.00%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-100.00%
Inventory growth above 1.5x FSM's -18.24%. Michael Burry might suspect a looming inventory glut. Check free cash flow impact.
-15.29%
Other current assets growth < half of FSM's 51069.06%. David Dodd sees a leaner approach to short-term items.
-4.14%
Below half of FSM's -50.24%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.78%
Less than half of FSM's -28.99%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
4.78%
Below half of FSM's 62.19%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.88%
Below half of FSM's -100.00%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
-25.28%
Less than half of FSM's 23.29%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.72%
Less than half of FSM's 323.97%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.65%
Less than half of FSM's 235.42%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
0.65%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to FSM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.72%
Less than half of FSM's 270.25%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.97%
≥ 1.5x FSM's 4.44%. David Dodd sees higher yoy retained profits than competitor.
0.29%
Less than half of FSM's -100.00%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.99%
≥ 1.5x FSM's 0.92%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
3.88%
Below half FSM's -100.00%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.66%
Less than half of FSM's 238.86%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.