95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-34.72%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-34.72% vs NEM's -17.63%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-34.72%
Cash + STI yoy ≥ 1.5x NEM's -16.95%. David Dodd might see it as a strategic cash buffer advantage. Evaluate deployment plans.
43.63%
Receivables growth 1.25-1.5x NEM's 30.72%. Martin Whitman would worry that the company may be booking revenue too aggressively.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
261.06%
Above 1.5x NEM's 4.72%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
-17.49%
≥ 1.5x NEM's -4.72%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.06%
Less than half of NEM's 149.62%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-0.06%
Below half of NEM's 4.19%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.23%
Below half of NEM's 2.67%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
46.52%
Less than half of NEM's -10.32%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.51%
50-75% of NEM's -5.47%. Bruce Berkowitz notes the firm keeps current liabilities growth relatively low.
-8.57%
Less than half of NEM's 7.57%. David Dodd sees more deleveraging vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.57%
Less than half of NEM's 2.16%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.16%
Less than half of NEM's 0.42%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.38%
Below half NEM's 46.32%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-1.05%
50-75% of NEM's -2.09%. Bruce Berkowitz notes relatively lower AOCI expansions.
-100.00%
Higher Other Stockholders' Equity Items Growth compared to NEM's zero value, indicating worse performance.
4.09%
Similar yoy to NEM's 4.43%. Walter Schloss sees parallel net worth trends.
-0.23%
Below half NEM's 2.67%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.99%
Less than half of NEM's 7.11%. David Dodd sees less overall debt expansion vs. competitor.
-7.34%
Less than half of NEM's 24.96%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.