95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
-3.16%
Both companies show declining cash positions (-3.16% vs RGLD's -3.12%). Seth Klarman would examine if this reflects broader market conditions or operational challenges.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.16%
Similar yoy growth to RGLD's -3.12%. Walter Schloss would note comparable liquidity expansions. Examine capital usage strategies.
-22.74%
Receivables growth less than half of RGLD's 23.04%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
-100.00%
Higher Inventory Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-15.29%
Higher Other Current Assets Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-4.14%
≥ 1.5x RGLD's -0.74%. David Dodd might see a short-term liquidity advantage or potential underutilized capital.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.78%
Less than half of RGLD's -2.72%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
4.78%
Similar yoy growth to RGLD's 4.94%. Walter Schloss finds parallel expansions in non-current assets.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.88%
≥ 1.5x RGLD's 2.38%. David Dodd notes a larger balance sheet expansion. Confirm it's not overleveraged.
-25.28%
Less than half of RGLD's 79.26%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.72%
Less than half of RGLD's -7.72%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.65%
Less than half of RGLD's -5.98%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
0.65%
Higher Other Liabilities Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating worse performance.
0.72%
Less than half of RGLD's -6.78%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.97%
Below half RGLD's 525.35%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
0.29%
Less than half of RGLD's -32.83%. David Dodd sees fewer intangible or market-driven swings than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.99%
1.25-1.5x RGLD's 3.12%. Bruce Berkowitz notes an above-average equity expansion.
3.88%
≥ 1.5x RGLD's 2.38%. David Dodd sees faster overall balance sheet growth than competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.66%
1.25-1.5x RGLD's 3.12%. Martin Whitman is wary of heavier net leverage vs. competitor.