95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.80M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
58.19%
Cash & equivalents growing 58.19% while RGLD's declined -29.09%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
58.19%
Below half of RGLD's -29.09%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-24.73%
Receivables growth less than half of RGLD's 10.20%. David Dodd might see more conservative credit practices, provided revenue isn't suffering.
280.32%
Inventory growth below half of RGLD's -30.89%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
1312.70%
Above 1.5x RGLD's 47.38%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
54.34%
Below half of RGLD's -21.89%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-1.02%
Below half RGLD's 9.48%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.38%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-3.38%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-15.96%
Both RGLD and the company show zero Long-Term Investments Growth.
-8.26%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-3.06%
Less than half of RGLD's 5.04%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
-1.27%
Below half of RGLD's 9.31%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.09%
Below half of RGLD's 5.81%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
13.56%
Less than half of RGLD's -14.49%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined AP approach or lower volume.
-1.79%
Higher Short-Term Debt Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.79%
Higher Deferred Revenue (Current) Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating better performance.
-1.41%
Less than half of RGLD's 19.94%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in other current obligations.
7.52%
Less than half of RGLD's 15.71%. David Dodd sees a more disciplined short-term liability approach.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.06%
Higher Non-Current Deferred Revenue Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating better performance.
9.52%
Less than half of RGLD's -0.36%. David Dodd sees fewer additions to deferred tax liabilities vs. competitor.
27.22%
Less than half of RGLD's -3.66%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
19.04%
Less than half of RGLD's 98.63%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.95%
Less than half of RGLD's 69.49%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.28%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating worse performance.
3.06%
Below half RGLD's 17.64%. Michael Burry suspects major net losses or high dividends vs. competitor.
-24.59%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.03%
0.5-0.75x RGLD's 2.05%. Martin Whitman is wary of lagging equity growth vs. competitor.
1.09%
Below half RGLD's 5.81%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
-15.96%
Both RGLD and the company show zero Total Investments Growth.
-7.67%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-59.13%
Less than half of RGLD's 71.31%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.