PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wheaton Precious Metals Corp. (WPM)
96.701.20 (1.26%)
95.23 - 97.14
55.47 - 103.81
1.63M / 1.81M (Avg.)
55.57 | 1.74
Identifies how quickly the company is scaling its balance sheet (via acquisitions, expansions, or debt). Strong growth, accompanied by sound fundamentals, can support long-term intrinsic value—while disproportionate debt expansion or bloated intangible assets can signal elevated risk.
10.25%
Cash & equivalents growing 10.25% while RGLD's declined -56.44%. Peter Lynch would see this as a sign of superior liquidity management.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.25%
Below half of RGLD's -56.44%. Michael Burry might suspect a liquidity shortfall if there's no alternative capital plan.
-31.31%
Receivables growth above 1.5x RGLD's -2.35%. Michael Burry would check for potential credit bubble or inflated top-line.
-5.56%
Inventory growth below half of RGLD's 3.94%. David Dodd would check if that's due to efficiency or supply constraints.
315.73%
Above 1.5x RGLD's 17.81%. Michael Burry might investigate for potential short-term asset misclassification or risk.
8.90%
Below half of RGLD's -46.59%. Michael Burry could suspect a liquidity squeeze. Verify operational performance.
-0.58%
Below half RGLD's 29.06%. Michael Burry sees potential underinvestment risk unless there's a valid reason (asset-light model).
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.90%
Higher Intangible Assets Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-3.90%
Higher Goodwill + Intangibles Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating worse performance.
216.09%
Higher Long-Term Investments Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating better performance.
-46.75%
Higher Tax Assets Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating worse performance.
311.74%
Less than half of RGLD's -9.94%. David Dodd sees fewer expansions in non-core assets. Possibly a simpler focus.
1.61%
Below half of RGLD's 27.15%. Michael Burry might suspect stagnation or lack of resources for expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.15%
Below half of RGLD's 18.36%. Michael Burry sees a potential red flag for stagnation or capital shortage.
18.10%
Above 1.5x RGLD's 3.75%. Michael Burry questions if payables are being stretched to avoid short-term borrowing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6253.61%
Exceeding 1.5x RGLD's 0.35%. Michael Burry suspects ballooning short-term obligations vs. competitor.
27.57%
Above 1.5x RGLD's 0.72%. Michael Burry sees a red flag for liquidity risk vs. competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
727.97%
Above 1.5x RGLD's 62.63%. Michael Burry sees a much bigger deferred tax load building up.
12.39%
Less than half of RGLD's -5.11%. David Dodd notes more conservative expansions in non-current obligations.
7.40%
Less than half of RGLD's 541.28%. David Dodd sees a more conservative approach to non-current liabilities.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
21.60%
Less than half of RGLD's 320.02%. David Dodd sees far fewer liability expansions relative to competitor.
0.32%
Higher Common Stock (Book Value) Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating worse performance.
4.67%
Similar yoy to RGLD's 4.82%. Walter Schloss sees parallel earnings retention vs. competitor.
-39.18%
Higher AOCI Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating worse performance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.06%
≥ 1.5x RGLD's 0.87%. David Dodd sees stronger capital base growth than competitor.
2.15%
Below half RGLD's 18.36%. Michael Burry sees significant shrinkage or inactivity vs. competitor.
216.09%
Higher Total Investments Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating better performance.
-11.95%
Higher Total Debt Growth compared to RGLD's zero value, indicating worse performance.
-10.37%
Less than half of RGLD's 215.49%. David Dodd sees better deleveraging or stronger cash buildup than competitor.